Film festivals are not theaters.
Theaters are for films that have secured
distribution.
Film festivals came about as a way for
undiscovered films still
looking for an audience to reach out to communities at a
grassroots level.
Sometimes film festivals take place in theaters. Sometimes they don't.
Convoluting the two (festivals and theaters) won't do anyone or either industry any good in the long run.
Cannes is an
Industry Film Festival. Created by the industry. For the industry.
Perhaps
Industry Film Festivals should be labels as such to clarify the distinction and help preserve the integrity of
Independent Film Festivals.
Quentin Tarantino's latest film doesn't need Cannes for distribution. That glorious bastard undoubtedly has it in the bag! Cannes is just a nice way to start things off. It's a fun little marketing ploy and finishing touch for a film's long journey - particularly considering the
filmmaker's history at the festival. Necessary, no. But with Cannes, that's not the point.
Cannes is a shin dig for industry types. A place for buyers and sellers to gather and sweat things out in these tumultuous times of change within the industry. A place for stars to shine on the red carpet as the press clamors striving for the money shot. A place for filmmakers to meet and network.
Cannes is all about the industry. Sometimes it seems the industry has forgotten about filmmaking... has forgotten about the audience. Perhaps this is, in part, what led
Geoffrey Gilmore to question whether or not film festivals would become obsolete in 10 years while
Gilles Jacob exclaimed that festivals were alive and well. While Gilmore tried diligently to broaden the audience of independent film over the years, Jacobs exclaims that Cannes' is all about the Independents... claiming you just need to look due East.
As far as the 'anglos' go. They are alive and well, thank you very much. Maybe the problem Cannes has with them is that these films truly are independent. Cannes makes its money off the industry, not off independents. If a studio or country is backing a film then money will be spent in Cannes (of course, this year is different since some Westerners may not be attending Cannes due to the state of the economy, in part).
Independent filmmakers not backed by a studio, or a country, don't really have as much to offer Cannes. France's Center for National Cinema (CNC) forked over approximately half of
Cannes 20 million euro budget this year. Rinky dink, truly independent films just don't bring in the kind of money Cannes needs to generate to justify its funding. Besides, if festivals weren't alive and well... what would Cannes be?
Gilmore... hmmm. There is no doubt this man loves the independents and film in general. He's passionate about it. Stop. Let's just stop. Let's clarify. 'Indie' arms of studios are
not independent films. They are low budget arms of studios that generally range between $1-15 million. Mixing words hurts independents and helps low budget studio films. Well, that might be great for studios and the 'industry' but it hurts the world of truly independent filmmaking - particularly when discussing profit margins and revenue.
Let's not get caught up in the dichotomy. Perhaps, over the years, with all the hoopla and expectations aimed at Sundance things got a little mixed up. In the end, Gilmore walked over to a world that will allow him to deal with the fascinating and newly unraveling world of distribution. A world he can help mold and create. Smart move on the part of Tribeca - it needs direction and Gilmore was ready for change in a world awaiting someone like him to take the reigns. Nonetheless, he's perhaps backing away from festivals and questioning whether or not they even need to (or can) exist. They can... they just need a little purification.
More than ever film festivals are vitally important for the truly independent filmmaker. Festivals might not be important to the
industry which constantly narrows its reach preferring to focus on 'franchises' rather than films. Fine. But what does that have to do with filmmaking? Nothing. It has to do with formulated profit for corporations.
So perhaps the conversation needs to be updated. Perhaps it's time for a little more separation. Industry productions have little-to-nothing to do with independent filmmaking.
It's time to recreate the conversation. Let's get back to basics.
Film festivals are a way to bring independent films to communities. Through this initial grassroots effort a filmmaker can then spawn off into different directions allowing word-of-mouth, the audience and viewership to grow.
Independent film festivals should not try to emulate industry film festivals. On the contrary. Allow a fest to grow out of need. Allow it to occur organically rather based on the needs of a community (there are many types of communities - not all are local) than fabricated by corporate design.
There is a great demand by both independent filmmakers and their audience to connect. It is quite possible that sales reps, distribution companies and studios will become obsolete in this process. Studios don't need indies. The two don't necessarily even coincide well together. Independents don't need studios. That can be a scary thought for an independent filmmaker... but trust that the market is yours for the taking. Studios and indies often have an overlapping audience but that should not be confused with the two entities being one of the same. They are not.
"I think there are old models here," said Gilmore, asked to survey his new city and the future of festivals in general. "To be honest, that's the kind of question I think about a lot: how to reinvent festivals, what they should be doing, whether or not their agendas—which have evolved greatly—need to be rethought completely."
Film festivals need to be a springboard for new and emerging films, not a trench coat for unsavory sights.